Absolute Deviation

I DEDICATE THIS TEXT TO THE EUCARIST AND RESSENTIMENTALIST MUMMIES OF IDEOLOGICAL PONTIFICATION! THEY KNOW WHO THEY ARE!

Most minds are merely part of the interwoven ideological fabric of their time and cultural conditions; they are wrapped in a dense mesh of interests, customs, traditions, and preconceived views/social biases which bind them hard to the cheapest commonplace, their thoughts incorporated into the mental whole which constitutes their immediate society; they cannot escape from these psychic bonds because they know not that they are bound.*

But every so often an energetic minority appears that is in rebellion against the ossified institutions, social practices, and paradigms of their culture-and who engage in absolute deviation from the thought processes that hold the Herd in thrall. Absolute deviation begins with a suspicion: that the predominant modes of intellectual and political critique in Society don’t serve the needs and interests of the individual who had this suspicion, and that all the ancient axioms regarding authority and political institutions-all the musty, stale theories of freedom and social change-are shallow relics of bygone periods and stumbling blocks to the activities of the present. In order to develop ideas and praxis relevant to the actualization of self-rule one needs to step outside of socialized mentalities entirely and remain in constant opposition to the intellectual currents championed by the lapdogs. This requires a heretical break from the humanistic and post-enlightenment worldview that informs all as­pects of the present popular discourse; it requires the banishment of all stereotypical thought, and a total refusal of the fundamental rot pervasive throughout Western civilization’s most precious values.

Absolute deviation entails a disdain for all known theories (all existing philosophical, scientific and epistemological systems) and can be viewed as a method for clearing the slate, banishing the spooks, of sweeping aside the heritages that thwart and limit growth, and of severing oneself from the Herd Mind in order to make way for innovative strategies -strategies unheard of, unread of, and undreamed of before.

*IT IS NAIVE TO BELIEVE THAT MANY TIMES PEOPLE DON’T KNOW THIS. THEY MIGHT AS WELL UNDERSTAND IT BUT STILL REMAIN IN IT FOR THE COMFORT IT OFFERS. ALL THOSE WHO FOLLOW AN IDEOLOGY MIGHT NOT ALWAYS DO IT BECAUSE THEY ARE UNAWARE OF IT BUT BECAUSE THEY WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO BREAK WITH THE MORALITY AND SAFETY OF THEIR SOCIAL MILLIEUS. NIHILISTICALLY THIS IS MY CONCLUSION. OTHERWISE WE WOULD SPEAK ABOUT AN ETHICAL LIBERATION, SOMETHING THAT I TOTALLY REJECT. EVEN SEEN FROM THE POINT OF VIEW THAT THE SENTENCE EXPRESSES WE WOULD HAVE TO ASSUME THAT IF THEY KNEW, THEY WOULD COMBAT IT, OR EVEN THAT THEY WOULD HAVE THE INTELLECTUAL CAPACITY TO BREAK FROM IT, SOMETHING THAT I MISANTHROPICALLY REJECT, SINCE NOT ALL HUMANS HAVE THE CAPACITY FOR THE SAME INTELLECT. AND DOES THIS MEAN THAT THOSE WHO POSSESS IT ARE, JUST LIKE THAT, ”FREE”? HAHAHAHAHAHA!